Collaborate with your competitors and win
Impact in
- Authors
- Gary Hamel
- Journal
- Harvard business review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w92012607 →Countries where authors are citing Collaborate with your competitors and win
This map shows the geographic impact of Collaborate with your competitors and win. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Collaborate with your competitors and win with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Collaborate with your competitors and win more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Collaborate with your competitors and win
This network shows the impact of Collaborate with your competitors and win. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Collaborate with your competitors and win.
About Collaborate with your competitors and win
This paper, published in 1989, received 1.4k indexed citations . Written by Gary Hamel. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (1.2k citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (228 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (211 citations), Economics and Econometrics (195 citations) and Management Information Systems (194 citations). Published in Harvard business review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w92012607.