Readings in the Management of Innovation
Impact in
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w91141925 →Countries where authors are citing Readings in the Management of Innovation
This map shows the geographic impact of Readings in the Management of Innovation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Readings in the Management of Innovation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Readings in the Management of Innovation more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Readings in the Management of Innovation
This network shows the impact of Readings in the Management of Innovation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Readings in the Management of Innovation.
About Readings in the Management of Innovation
This paper, published in 1988, received 586 indexed citations . Written by Michael L. Tushman and William L. Moore. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (392 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (135 citations), Economics and Econometrics (116 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (114 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (67 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w91141925.