The cortisol awakening response - normal values and confounds.
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w89976737 →Countries where authors are citing The cortisol awakening response - normal values and confounds.
This map shows the geographic impact of The cortisol awakening response - normal values and confounds.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The cortisol awakening response - normal values and confounds. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The cortisol awakening response - normal values and confounds. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The cortisol awakening response - normal values and confounds.
This network shows the impact of The cortisol awakening response - normal values and confounds.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The cortisol awakening response - normal values and confounds..
About The cortisol awakening response - normal values and confounds.
This paper, published in 2000, received 608 indexed citations . Written by Stefan Wüst, Jutta M. Wolf, Dirk H. Hellhammer, Ilona S. Federenko, Nicole C. Schommer and Clemens Kirschbaum covering the research area of General Health Professions, Behavioral Neuroscience and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Behavioral Neuroscience (413 citations), Clinical Psychology (115 citations), Social Psychology (105 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (99 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (79 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w89976737.