Armstrong's Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice
Impact in
- Authors
- Michael Armstrong
- Journal
- Khazar University Institutional Repository (Khazar University)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w72098141 →Countries where authors are citing Armstrong's Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice
This map shows the geographic impact of Armstrong's Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Armstrong's Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Armstrong's Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Armstrong's Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice
This network shows the impact of Armstrong's Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Armstrong's Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice.
About Armstrong's Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice
This paper, published in 2009, received 915 indexed citations . Written by Michael Armstrong. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (378 citations), Strategy and Management (141 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (110 citations), Education (96 citations) and Social Psychology (83 citations). Published in Khazar University Institutional Repository (Khazar University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w72098141.