Implementing Change: Patterns, Principles, and Potholes
Impact in
- Education 601
Classified as
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w67344544 →Countries where authors are citing Implementing Change: Patterns, Principles, and Potholes
This map shows the geographic impact of Implementing Change: Patterns, Principles, and Potholes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Implementing Change: Patterns, Principles, and Potholes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Implementing Change: Patterns, Principles, and Potholes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Implementing Change: Patterns, Principles, and Potholes
This network shows the impact of Implementing Change: Patterns, Principles, and Potholes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Implementing Change: Patterns, Principles, and Potholes.
About Implementing Change: Patterns, Principles, and Potholes
This paper, published in 2000, received 895 indexed citations . Written by Gene E. Hall, Shirley M. Hord, Bruce Joyce and Stephen Anderson covering the research area of Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Management Science and Operations Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (601 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (166 citations), Information Systems and Management (100 citations), Information Systems (71 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (66 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w67344544.