Positive organizational scholarship : foundations of a new discipline
Impact in
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w11367367 →Countries where authors are citing Positive organizational scholarship : foundations of a new discipline
This map shows the geographic impact of Positive organizational scholarship : foundations of a new discipline. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Positive organizational scholarship : foundations of a new discipline with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Positive organizational scholarship : foundations of a new discipline more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Positive organizational scholarship : foundations of a new discipline
This network shows the impact of Positive organizational scholarship : foundations of a new discipline. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Positive organizational scholarship : foundations of a new discipline.
About Positive organizational scholarship : foundations of a new discipline
This paper, published in 2003, received 2.3k indexed citations . Written by Kim S. Cameron, Jane E. Dutton and Robert E. Quinn. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.2k citations), Social Psychology (754 citations), Sociology and Political Science (422 citations), Strategy and Management (387 citations) and Demography (365 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w11367367.