Risk Management: Coordinating Corporate Investment and Financing Policies
Impact in
- Accounting 1.8k
Classified as
- Journal
- The Journal of Finance
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05123.x →Countries where authors are citing Risk Management: Coordinating Corporate Investment and Financing Policies
This map shows the geographic impact of Risk Management: Coordinating Corporate Investment and Financing Policies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Risk Management: Coordinating Corporate Investment and Financing Policies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Risk Management: Coordinating Corporate Investment and Financing Policies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Risk Management: Coordinating Corporate Investment and Financing Policies
This network shows the impact of Risk Management: Coordinating Corporate Investment and Financing Policies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Risk Management: Coordinating Corporate Investment and Financing Policies.
About Risk Management: Coordinating Corporate Investment and Financing Policies
This paper, published in 1993, received 2.2k indexed citations . Written by Kenneth Froot, David Scharfstein and Jeremy C. Stein covering the research area of Accounting. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Accounting (1.8k citations), Economics and Econometrics (1.0k citations), Finance (853 citations), Strategy and Management (289 citations) and Management Information Systems (96 citations). Published in The Journal of Finance.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05123.x.