y-Randomization and Its Variants in QSPR/QSAR
Impact in
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ci700157b →Countries where authors are citing y-Randomization and Its Variants in QSPR/QSAR
This map shows the geographic impact of y-Randomization and Its Variants in QSPR/QSAR. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by y-Randomization and Its Variants in QSPR/QSAR with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites y-Randomization and Its Variants in QSPR/QSAR more than expected).
Fields of papers citing y-Randomization and Its Variants in QSPR/QSAR
This network shows the impact of y-Randomization and Its Variants in QSPR/QSAR. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the y-Randomization and Its Variants in QSPR/QSAR.
About y-Randomization and Its Variants in QSPR/QSAR
This paper, published in 2007, received 768 indexed citations . Written by Christoph Rücker, Gerta Rücker and Markus Meringer covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Statistics and Probability. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computational Theory and Mathematics (488 citations), Molecular Biology (230 citations), Organic Chemistry (199 citations), Materials Chemistry (134 citations) and Spectroscopy (82 citations). Published in Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ci700157b.