The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Slavoj Žižek
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3529457 →Countries where authors are citing The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology
This map shows the geographic impact of The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology
This network shows the impact of The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology.
About The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology
This paper, published in 1999, received 768 indexed citations . Written by Slavoj Žižek covering the research area of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (361 citations), Political Science and International Relations (178 citations), Clinical Psychology (174 citations), Philosophy (140 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (86 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3529457.