Zihe Ding
Impact in
-
- Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis
Papers in
-
- Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis 4
- Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants 3
- Natural Compounds in Disease Treatment 3
-
- Phytochemical Studies and Bioactivities 2
- Co-authors
- Renxing Zhong (11 shared papers)Zunpeng Shu (11 shared papers)Yanni Yang (7 shared papers)Wujing Wang (5 shared papers)Tianyi Xia (3 shared papers)Na Xing (2 shared papers)Tianyi Xia (7 shared papers)Yun Luo (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy (3 papers)Journal of Ethnopharmacology (2 papers)International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (2 papers)Frontiers in Pharmacology (1 paper)Pharmacological Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- China
In The Last Decade
Zihe Ding
15 papers receiving 331 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Complementary and alternative medicine 54
- Pharmacology 30
- Biological Psychiatry 7
- Immunology 38
- Molecular Biology 121
Countries citing papers authored by Zihe Ding
This map shows the geographic impact of Zihe Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zihe Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zihe Ding more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Zihe Ding
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zihe Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zihe Ding. The network helps show where Zihe Ding may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Zihe Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 113 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 54 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 35 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 1 |
About Zihe Ding
Zihe Ding is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Food Science and Pharmacology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (4 papers), Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants (3 papers), Natural Compounds in Disease Treatment (3 papers), Phytochemical Studies and Bioactivities (2 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (2 papers), Plant-based Medicinal Research (2 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (1 paper) and Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (54 citations), Pharmacology (30 citations), Biological Psychiatry (7 citations), Immunology (38 citations) and Molecular Biology (121 citations). Zihe Ding has collaborated with scholars based in China. Frequent co-authors include Renxing Zhong, Zunpeng Shu, Yanni Yang, Wujing Wang, Tianyi Xia, Na Xing, Tianyi Xia, Yun Luo, Shuyuan Li and Bing‐You Yang. Their work appears in journals such as Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, Frontiers in Pharmacology and Pharmacological Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.