Zhimo Yao

457 citations
24 papers · 286 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Zhimo Yao

22 papers receiving 285 citations

Peers

Zhimo Yao
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 217
  • Ophthalmology 68
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 67
  • Epidemiology 109
  • Sensory Systems 11
Replace Jianliang Tong with:
Jianliang Tong United States
Hee‐kyoung Ko United States
Sach Sokol United States
Summer L. Thompson United States
Jan W. Kurzawski Italy
Mirella Gualtieri Brazil
Satoshi Nakadomari Japan
Cláudia Feitosa-Santana Brazil
Andrew T. Astle United Kingdom
Davina R. Hocking United States
Zhimo Yao relative to Jianliang Tong United States Jianliang Tong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Jianliang Tong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Zhimo Yao

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Zhimo Yao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zhimo Yao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zhimo Yao more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Zhimo Yao

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zhimo Yao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zhimo Yao. The network helps show where Zhimo Yao may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Zhimo Yao, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Zhimo Yao Line = papers co-authored together Zhimo Yao links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201846
2 201937
3 201437
4
Structure, function and regulation of the mitochondrial peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor.
200228
5 201926
6 201421
7 201715
8 201713
9 202111
10 201610
11 20208
12 20237
13 20206
14 20225
15 20134
16 20223
17 20202
18
[Aging affects on the response irregularity of cells in different visual areas of cats].
20132
19 20222
20 20241

About Zhimo Yao

Zhimo Yao is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology and Epidemiology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 286 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (13 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (9 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (3 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (217 citations), Ophthalmology (68 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (67 citations), Epidemiology (109 citations) and Sensory Systems (11 citations). Zhimo Yao has collaborated with scholars based in China, Canada and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Jiawei Zhou, Robert F. Hess, Yifeng Zhou, Zhifen He, Fan Lü, LI Guang-xing, Lixia Feng, Alexandre Reynaud, Rong Liu and Jia Qu. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroscience, Neuropharmacology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Experimental Neurology and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact