Zhaoping Ding

3.4k citations
59 papers · 2.7k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Zhaoping Ding

57 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Zhaoping Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Physiology 404
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 741
  • Physiology 415
  • Cell Biology 272
  • Biophysics 95
Replace Travis W. Hein with:
Travis W. Hein United States
Dewan Zeng United States
Carmen Pérez-Terzic United States
Carolyn A. Carr United Kingdom
Richard M. Edwards United States
Harlan E. Ives United States
Chengqun Huang United States
Risa Korenaga Japan
Uliano Guerrini Italy
Steen Dissing Denmark
Zhaoping Ding relative to Travis W. Hein United States Travis W. Hein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Travis W. Hein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Zhaoping Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Zhaoping Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zhaoping Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zhaoping Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Zhaoping Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zhaoping Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zhaoping Ding. The network helps show where Zhaoping Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Zhaoping Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Zhaoping Ding Line = papers co-authored together Zhaoping Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004338
2 2008282
3 1998235
4 1999231
5 2004212
6 2012111
7 200376
8 201774
9 201573
10 201159
11 201159
12 201058
13 201456
14 202152
15 201948
16 201143
17 202341
18 201340
19 201839
20 201337

About Zhaoping Ding

Zhaoping Ding is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Surgery and Physiology, having authored 59 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling (13 papers), Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (11 papers), Signaling Pathways in Disease (6 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (6 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (5 papers), Congenital heart defects research (5 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (5 papers) and Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (404 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (741 citations), Physiology (415 citations), Cell Biology (272 citations) and Biophysics (95 citations). Zhaoping Ding has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jürgen Schrader, Ulrich Flögel, Axel Gödecke, Christoph Jacoby, Ulrich K. M. Decking, Jens Hirchenhain, Rolf Schubert, Nadine Borg, Sebastian Temme and Hans‐Jürgen Bidmon. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation Research, Circulation, Cardiovascular Research, Scientific Reports and Stem Cell Research & Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact