Yao‐Ching Hung

3.5k citations
101 papers · 2.6k · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

Yao‐Ching Hung

101 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Yao‐Ching Hung
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 414
  • Reproductive Medicine 401
  • Biochemistry 106
  • Cancer Research 224
  • Oncology 300
Replace Yen‐Hua Huang with:
Yen‐Hua Huang Taiwan
Luiz Eurico Nasciutti Brazil
Wei-Chun Chang Taiwan
Thomas M. Zollner Germany
Shingo Miyamoto Japan
Tao Yi China
Xiaohua Wu China
Ki Hyung Kim South Korea
Jun Shao China
Mohammad Hojjat‐Farsangi Sweden
Yao‐Ching Hung relative to Yen‐Hua Huang Taiwan Yen‐Hua Huang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Yen‐Hua Huang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Yao‐Ching Hung

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Yao‐Ching Hung's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Yao‐Ching Hung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Yao‐Ching Hung more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Yao‐Ching Hung

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Yao‐Ching Hung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Yao‐Ching Hung. The network helps show where Yao‐Ching Hung may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Yao‐Ching Hung, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Yao‐Ching Hung Line = papers co-authored together Yao‐Ching Hung links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010164
2 2010142
3 2010107
4 200496
5 201192
6 200281
7 200264
8 200460
9 200255
10 201753
11 200653
12 200551
13 201251
14 200251
15 201549
16 200248
17 201248
18 201646
19 201443
20 201043

About Yao‐Ching Hung

Yao‐Ching Hung is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Molecular Biology, Surgery and Cancer Research, having authored 101 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (21 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (14 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (6 papers), Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (6 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (6 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (6 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (5 papers) and Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (414 citations), Reproductive Medicine (401 citations), Biochemistry (106 citations), Cancer Research (224 citations) and Oncology (300 citations). Yao‐Ching Hung has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Japan and China. Frequent co-authors include Guewha Steven Huang, Wei-Chun Chang, Masatsugu Ueda, Minoru Ueki, Yoshito Terai, Meng‐Yen Hong, Lian‐Shung Yeh, Yu-Shiun Chen, Wen‐Lung Ma and G. Steven Huang. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, Nanotechnology, Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact