Xu-Min Li

671 citations
8 papers · 566 · 1 hit paper · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Xu-Min Li

7 papers receiving 550 citations

Xu-Min Li's Hit Papers

Bioavailability of Tea Catechins and Its Improvement 2018 · 273 citations
2730+2+5Years since publication50100150200250

Peers

Xu-Min Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Biochemistry 158
  • Biological Psychiatry 58
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 34
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 266
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 53
Replace Liang-Yi Wu with:
Liang-Yi Wu Taiwan
Yewei Huang China
Limin Xiang China
Yushun Gong China
Beverly A. Warden United States
Guoliang Jie China
Katarzyna Naparło Poland
Yuuichi Ukawa Japan
Sirima Puangpraphant United States
Sudathip Sae‐tan Thailand
Xu-Min Li relative to Liang-Yi Wu Taiwan Liang-Yi Wu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Liang-Yi Wu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xu-Min Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xu-Min Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xu-Min Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xu-Min Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xu-Min Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xu-Min Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xu-Min Li. The network helps show where Xu-Min Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Xu-Min Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xu-Min Li Line = papers co-authored together Xu-Min Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1
Bioavailability of Tea Catechins and Its Improvement
Hit paper breakdown →
2018273
2 2017100
3 201872
4 201851
5 201941
6 201821
7 20188
8 20250

About Xu-Min Li

Xu-Min Li is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Biochemistry, Food Science, Molecular Biology and Cell Biology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 566 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tea Polyphenols and Effects (5 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (4 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2 papers), Food Quality and Safety Studies (2 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (1 paper), Advances in Cucurbitaceae Research (1 paper) and Microencapsulation and Drying Processes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (158 citations), Biological Psychiatry (58 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (34 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (266 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (53 citations). Xu-Min Li has collaborated with scholars based in China. Frequent co-authors include Xin‐Qiang Zheng, Yue‐Rong Liang, Jian‐Hui Ye, Jian‐Liang Lu, Rui Yang, Yunlong Shi, Liping Xiang, Zhuo‐Yu Cai, Kairong Wang and Meng Shi. Their work appears in journals such as Molecules, HortScience, Scientific Reports, Scientific Data and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact