Xiaoting Li

509 citations
26 papers · 199 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Xiaoting Li

21 papers receiving 195 citations

Peers

Xiaoting Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Language and Linguistics 166
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 123
  • Literature and Literary Theory 65
  • Human-Computer Interaction 24
  • Linguistics and Language 17
Replace Elisabeth Reber with:
Elisabeth Reber Germany
Martin Weißer China
Emma M. Betz Canada
Niina Lilja Finland
Carmen Taleghani‐Nikazm United States
Mercedes Querol-Julián Spain
Sophia Marmaridou Greece
Michael J. McCarthy United Kingdom
Wolfgang Imo Germany
Ruslan Suvorov United States
Xiaoting Li relative to Elisabeth Reber Germany Elisabeth Reber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Elisabeth Reber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiaoting Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiaoting Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiaoting Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiaoting Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiaoting Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiaoting Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiaoting Li. The network helps show where Xiaoting Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Xiaoting Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiaoting Li Line = papers co-authored together Xiaoting Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201441
2 201437
3 202120
4 201614
5 201313
6 202013
7 202011
8 20168
9 20217
10 20197
11 20175
12 20184
13 20243
14 20243
15 20243
16 20193
17 20242
18 20192
19 20161
20 20221

About Xiaoting Li

Xiaoting Li is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Human-Computer Interaction and Linguistics and Language, having authored 26 papers that have together received 199 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (19 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (18 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (9 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (9 papers), Digital Communication and Language (4 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (2 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (1 paper) and Second Language Learning and Teaching (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (166 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (123 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (65 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (24 citations) and Linguistics and Language (17 citations). Xiaoting Li has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, China and France. Frequent co-authors include Simona Pekarek Doehler, Leelo Keevallik, Martin Havlík, Jie Luo, Yaqiong Liu, Aziz Altaf Khuwaja, Xiaoyun Wang, Nan Zhao, Stéphane Bonnet and Yunfei Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Research on Language and Social Interaction, Open Linguistics, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Journal of Contemporary China and Journal of Pragmatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact