Xiaoping Wang

1.1k citations
57 papers · 795 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Xiaoping Wang

50 papers receiving 776 citations

Peers

Xiaoping Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Clinical Psychology 274
  • Developmental Neuroscience 22
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 23
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 112
  • Social Psychology 122
Replace Elizabeth A. Corsentino with:
Elizabeth A. Corsentino United States
Leonardo Machado Brazil
Tomoya Hirota United States
Valérie Bergua France
Attari Abbas Iran
George Konstantakopoulos Greece
Srikala Bharath India
Salman Karim United Kingdom
Stacy Schantz Wilkins United States
Kirsty Griffiths United Kingdom
Xiaoping Wang relative to Elizabeth A. Corsentino United States Elizabeth A. Corsentino's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.7×
Elizabeth A. Corsentino · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiaoping Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiaoping Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiaoping Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiaoping Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiaoping Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiaoping Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiaoping Wang. The network helps show where Xiaoping Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xiaoping Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiaoping Wang Line = papers co-authored together Xiaoping Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201296
2 202096
3 202237
4 201736
5 201533
6 201332
7 201531
8 201329
9 201329
10 201328
11 201825
12 202322
13 201221
14 201921
15 202318
16 201216
17 201416
18 202216
19 201715
20 201815

About Xiaoping Wang

Xiaoping Wang is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 57 papers that have together received 795 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (6 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (4 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (4 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (2 papers) and Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (274 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (22 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (23 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (112 citations) and Social Psychology (122 citations). Xiaoping Wang has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jiansong Zhou, Achim Wolf, Yu‐Tao Xiang, Renrong Wu, Jingping Zhao, Ziwei Teng, Jing Huang, Fangkun Liu, Jindong Chen and Zhen Yuan. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Affective Disorders, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Asia-Pacific Psychiatry and Molecular Neurobiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact