Fred Loya

767 citations
21 papers · 578 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Fred Loya

21 papers receiving 540 citations

Peers

Fred Loya
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 48
  • Clinical Psychology 191
  • Health 65
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 130
  • Social Psychology 108
Replace Marı́a A. Ruipérez with:
Marı́a A. Ruipérez Spain
Ronald C. Albucher United States
Briana L. Robustelli United States
Jeewook Choi South Korea
Emily M. Cohodes United States
Gadi Lubin Israel
Katayun Hassanpour Switzerland
Kate B. Nooner United States
Donald P. Woolley United States
Roseann Hannon United States
Fred Loya relative to Marı́a A. Ruipérez Spain Marı́a A. Ruipérez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Marı́a A. Ruipérez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fred Loya

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Loya's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Loya with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Loya more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fred Loya

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Loya. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Loya. The network helps show where Fred Loya may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Fred Loya, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fred Loya Line = papers co-authored together Fred Loya links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005134
2 1986120
3 2010103
4 201336
5 198235
6 201823
7 197918
8 201616
9 198916
10 201411
11 198011
12 198511
13 198010
14
Patterns of homicide victimization in the city of Los Angeles, 1970-79.
19869
15 20137
16 20176
17
Sexual therapy of patients with cardiovascular disease.
19775
18 19793
19 20192
20 20251

About Fred Loya

Fred Loya is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 21 papers that have together received 578 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (4 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (3 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (48 citations), Clinical Psychology (191 citations), Health (65 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (130 citations) and Social Psychology (108 citations). Fred Loya has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Stephen P. Hinshaw, Jennifer J. Quinn, Radhika Reddy, Michael S. Fanselow, James A. Mercy, N. H. Allen, J. Carson Smith, Mark L. Rosenberg, Richard A. Goodman and Russell L. Kolts. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Psychological Bulletin, Journal of Neurotrauma, Handbook of clinical neurology and Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact