Xiao‐Ping Dong

7.5k citations
306 papers · 6.2k · h-index 36

Impact in

Papers in

Xiao‐Ping Dong

301 papers receiving 6k citations

Peers

Xiao‐Ping Dong
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Molecular Biology 2.4k
  • Infectious Diseases 704
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 338
  • Epidemiology 879
  • Neurology 127
Replace Chao‐Ke Tang with:
Chao‐Ke Tang China
Xiaohong Liu China
Qiong Chen China
Manfred Nairz Austria
Mengyuan Li China
Weiguo Dong China
Brian Gregory George Oliver Australia
Pasquale Maffia Italy
Yanfeng Xu China
Ning Li China
Xiao‐Ping Dong relative to Chao‐Ke Tang China Chao‐Ke Tang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Chao‐Ke Tang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiao‐Ping Dong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiao‐Ping Dong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiao‐Ping Dong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiao‐Ping Dong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiao‐Ping Dong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiao‐Ping Dong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiao‐Ping Dong. The network helps show where Xiao‐Ping Dong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xiao‐Ping Dong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiao‐Ping Dong Line = papers co-authored together Xiao‐Ping Dong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 306 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010418
2
Stability of SARS coronavirus in human specimens and environment and its sensitivity to heating and UV irradiation.
2003300
3 2006239
4 2007168
5 2007134
6 1994123
7 2016114
8 201393
9 200385
10 199984
11 201082
12 200963
13 200761
14 201061
15 201061
16 201157
17 201257
18 201557
19 200756
20 201553

About Xiao‐Ping Dong

Xiao‐Ping Dong is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Complementary and alternative medicine, Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases and Modeling and Simulation, having authored 306 papers that have together received 6.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (177 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (19 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (15 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (9 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (8 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (7 papers), Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research (7 papers) and COVID-19 epidemiological studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (2.4k citations), Infectious Diseases (704 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (338 citations), Epidemiology (879 citations) and Neurology (127 citations). Xiao‐Ping Dong has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Qi Shi, Jun Han, Baoyun Zhang, Chan Tian, Cao Chen, Cao Chen, Kang Xiao, Herbert Pfister, Dan Yan and Xiaohe Xiao. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Neurobiology, Prion, ACS Chemical Neuroscience, International Journal of Molecular Medicine and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact