Xiao-Ling Cheng

719 citations
22 papers · 607 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Xiao-Ling Cheng

21 papers receiving 595 citations

Peers

Xiao-Ling Cheng
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Spectroscopy 206
  • Analytical Chemistry 58
  • Biophysics 29
  • Computational Mechanics 98
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 75
Replace H. Maeda with:
H. Maeda Japan
Konstantin O. Nagornov Switzerland
Fahimeh Zarrin United States
Michael Ugarov United States
Taryn Guinan Australia
Verena Horneffer Germany
Bruno Bellina United Kingdom
Curtis A. Monnig United States
Xue‐Min Cheng China
Tina B. Angerer Sweden
Xiao-Ling Cheng relative to H. Maeda Japan H. Maeda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
H. Maeda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiao-Ling Cheng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiao-Ling Cheng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiao-Ling Cheng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiao-Ling Cheng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiao-Ling Cheng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiao-Ling Cheng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiao-Ling Cheng. The network helps show where Xiao-Ling Cheng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xiao-Ling Cheng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiao-Ling Cheng Line = papers co-authored together Xiao-Ling Cheng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017116
2 201976
3 202067
4 201466
5 201957
6 201848
7 201834
8 201927
9 202023
10 202013
11 201912
12 201711
13 202010
14 201410
15 20249
16 20177
17 20176
18 20176
19 20154
20 20183

About Xiao-Ling Cheng

Xiao-Ling Cheng is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Molecular Biology, Computational Mechanics, Biomedical Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 22 papers that have together received 607 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (8 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (3 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications (2 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (2 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (2 papers) and Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (206 citations), Analytical Chemistry (58 citations), Biophysics (29 citations), Computational Mechanics (98 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (75 citations). Xiao-Ling Cheng has collaborated with scholars based in China, Taiwan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Wei Hang, Zhibin Yin, Xiaoping Li, Quan‐Ming Wang, Rong Liu, Qing Tang, Guoxiang Hu, Ying‐Zi Han, Yifan Meng and Benli Huang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, Spectrochimica Acta Part B Atomic Spectroscopy, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Chemico-Biological Interactions and Analytical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact