Xiaofang Ding

24 papers receiving 374 citations

Peers

Xiaofang Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Reproductive Medicine 187
  • Cancer Research 54
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 93
  • Genetics 64
  • Immunology 44
Replace Chengliang Xiong with:
Chengliang Xiong China
Leilei Li China
Liliana Catherine Patiño Colombia
Szilárd Bodó Hungary
Kunming Li China
Irene Mondéjar Spain
Chung‐Hao Lu Taiwan
P. Beltrán-Breña Spain
Wuzi Dong China
Kusum Zaveri India
Xiaofang Ding relative to Chengliang Xiong China Chengliang Xiong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Chengliang Xiong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiaofang Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiaofang Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiaofang Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiaofang Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiaofang Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiaofang Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiaofang Ding. The network helps show where Xiaofang Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xiaofang Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiaofang Ding Line = papers co-authored together Xiaofang Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200773
2 200942
3 202138
4 200828
5 201326
6 201123
7 200622
8 201618
9 201517
10 201216
11 202015
12 20209
13 20229
14 20079
15 20227
16 20246
17 20185
18 20144
19 20073
20 20242

About Xiaofang Ding

Xiaofang Ding is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Immunology and Cancer Research, having authored 29 papers that have together received 378 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sperm and Testicular Function (11 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (4 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (4 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (3 papers), Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms (3 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (2 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (2 papers) and Renal and related cancers (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (187 citations), Cancer Research (54 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (93 citations), Genetics (64 citations) and Immunology (44 citations). Xiaofang Ding has collaborated with scholars based in China and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Honggang Li, Chengliang Xiong, Chengliang Xiong, Aihua Liao, Shiyun Huang, Chunlin Wu, Changhong Zhu, Cuicui Guo, Ling Zhang and Qian Zhao. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, Asian Journal of Andrology, Frontiers in Genetics, Molecular Human Reproduction and Journal of Extracellular Vesicles.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact