X. T. Wang

23 papers receiving 570 citations

Peers

X. T. Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • General Decision Sciences 284
  • Applied Psychology 127
  • Safety Research 70
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 9
  • Management Science and Operations Research 80
Replace Todd McElroy with:
Todd McElroy United States
Jane Ebert United States
Liat Hadar United States
Petko Kusev United Kingdom
Stephen A. Spiller United States
Marc Scholten Portugal
Dalia L. Diab United States
Timothy Buckley United States
Christoph Ungemach United States
Hannah H. Chang Singapore
X. T. Wang relative to Todd McElroy United States Todd McElroy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Todd McElroy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by X. T. Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of X. T. Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by X. T. Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites X. T. Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by X. T. Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by X. T. Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by X. T. Wang. The network helps show where X. T. Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside X. T. Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with X. T. Wang Line = papers co-authored together X. T. Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996158
2 2012102
3 199569
4 200747
5 200345
6 200643
7 201030
8 201319
9 202317
10 200716
11 202212
12 201512
13 20248
14
Analytical method for trace send-volatile organic compounds in the soil of Beijing suburbs
20038
15 20137
16 20227
17 20243
18 20232
19 20252
20 20251

About X. T. Wang

X. T. Wang is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 612 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (12 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (4 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (4 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (284 citations), Applied Psychology (127 citations), Safety Research (70 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (9 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (80 citations). X. T. Wang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Joseph G. Johnson, Victor S. Johnston, Daniel J. Kruger, Andreas Wilke, Liqi Zhu, Peng Wang, Peng Wang, Jianjun Zhou, Feng Xiao and Ralph Hertwig. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Frontiers in Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being and Journal of Materials Research and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact