Won-Mo Jung

887 citations
38 papers · 624 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Won-Mo Jung

35 papers receiving 598 citations

Peers

Won-Mo Jung
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 211
  • Neurology 90
  • Health Informatics 11
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 95
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 134
Replace Igor O. Korolev with:
Igor O. Korolev United States
Xiaoli Liu China
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative China
Mazlyfarina Mohamad Malaysia
Saeed Arif Shah Pakistan
Jussi Mattila Finland
Xinghua Yao China
Nicholas W. Sterling United States
for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative United States
Tayo Obafemi-Ajayi United States
Won-Mo Jung relative to Igor O. Korolev United States Igor O. Korolev's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12.4×
Igor O. Korolev · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Won-Mo Jung

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Won-Mo Jung's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Won-Mo Jung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Won-Mo Jung more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Won-Mo Jung

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Won-Mo Jung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Won-Mo Jung. The network helps show where Won-Mo Jung may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Won-Mo Jung, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Won-Mo Jung Line = papers co-authored together Won-Mo Jung links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019157
2 2020109
3 201629
4 201427
5 201827
6 201725
7 201820
8 201520
9 201919
10 201715
11 201915
12
Systematic Review of Selection of Acupuncture Points for Lower Back Pain
201213
13 201413
14 202011
15 202211
16 201710
17 201810
18 201710
19 20199
20 20208

About Won-Mo Jung

Won-Mo Jung is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Pharmacology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Dermatology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 624 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (18 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies (12 papers), Healthcare and Venom Research (8 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (4 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (4 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (3 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (3 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (211 citations), Neurology (90 citations), Health Informatics (11 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (95 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (134 citations). Won-Mo Jung has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Younbyoung Chae, Hi‐Joon Park, Ye‐Seul Lee, Xuenan Cui, Jae N. Lee, Mingjie Liu, Hakil Kim, In Ho Han, Cheng‐Bin Jin and In‐Seon Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Neuroscience, Scientific Reports, Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Journal of Visualized Experiments and Journal of Pain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact