Wolfram Stacklies
Impact in
- Biomaterials top 10%
- Silk-based biomaterials and applications
-
- Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
- Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Gene expression and cancer classification
- Biochemical and Structural Characterization
- Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Papers in
-
- Silk-based biomaterials and applications 3
-
- Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications 3
- Co-authors
- Henning Redestig (1 shared paper)Matthias Scholz (1 shared paper)Dirk M. Walther (1 shared paper)Joachim Selbig (1 shared paper)Frauke Gräter (8 shared papers)Senbo Xiao (3 shared papers)Bernd A. Markert (2 shared papers)Murat Çetinkaya (2 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Wolfram Stacklies
9 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Wolfram Stacklies's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
- Biomaterials 162
- Molecular Biology 580
- Structural Biology 9
- Genetics 153
- Plant Science 202
Countries citing papers authored by Wolfram Stacklies
This map shows the geographic impact of Wolfram Stacklies's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolfram Stacklies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolfram Stacklies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wolfram Stacklies
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wolfram Stacklies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wolfram Stacklies. The network helps show where Wolfram Stacklies may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Wolfram Stacklies, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pcaMethods—a bioconductor package providing PCA methods for incomplete data Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 927 |
| 2 | 2009 | 106 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 101 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 65 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 63 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 63 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 52 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 1 |
About Wolfram Stacklies
Wolfram Stacklies is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Immunology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Silk-based biomaterials and applications (3 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (2 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (2 papers), Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions (1 paper), Biochemical and Structural Characterization (1 paper), Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (1 paper) and Gene expression and cancer classification (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (162 citations), Molecular Biology (580 citations), Structural Biology (9 citations), Genetics (153 citations) and Plant Science (202 citations). Wolfram Stacklies has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, China and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Henning Redestig, Matthias Scholz, Dirk M. Walther, Joachim Selbig, Frauke Gräter, Senbo Xiao, Bernd A. Markert, Murat Çetinkaya, Christian Seifert and Fei Xia. Their work appears in journals such as Biophysical Journal, PLoS Computational Biology, Soft Matter, Bioinformatics and BMC Bioinformatics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.