Wolfgang Bicker
Impact in
- Spectroscopy top 1%
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Toxicology top 1%
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Papers in
- Spectroscopy 20
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 19
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 7
- Molecular spectroscopy and chirality 3
-
- Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies 10
- Co-authors
- Wolfgang Lindner (27 shared papers)Michael Lämmerhofer (20 shared papers)Junyan Wu (6 shared papers)Rudolf Krska (3 shared papers)Valery N. Bochkov (6 shared papers)Olga Oskolkova (6 shared papers)Beatrix Preinerstorfer (3 shared papers)Michael Sulyok (2 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Wolfgang Bicker
40 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Spectroscopy 930
- Toxicology 127
- Analytical Chemistry 374
- Biochemistry 83
- Biochemistry 100
Countries citing papers authored by Wolfgang Bicker
This map shows the geographic impact of Wolfgang Bicker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolfgang Bicker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolfgang Bicker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wolfgang Bicker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wolfgang Bicker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wolfgang Bicker. The network helps show where Wolfgang Bicker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wolfgang Bicker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 185 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 143 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 138 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 104 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 101 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 98 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 91 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 83 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 80 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 75 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 74 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 71 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 70 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 63 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 57 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 53 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 50 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 50 | |
| 19 | 2006 | 49 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 48 |
About Wolfgang Bicker
Wolfgang Bicker is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Plant Science and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 41 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (19 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (10 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (8 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Chromatography in Natural Products (5 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (4 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (3 papers) and Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (930 citations), Toxicology (127 citations), Analytical Chemistry (374 citations), Biochemistry (83 citations) and Biochemistry (100 citations). Wolfgang Bicker has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Wolfgang Lindner, Michael Lämmerhofer, Junyan Wu, Rudolf Krska, Valery N. Bochkov, Olga Oskolkova, Beatrix Preinerstorfer, Michael Sulyok, Raquel F. Pupo Nogueira and Román Labuda. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Separation Science, Journal of Chromatography A, Electrophoresis, Analytical Chemistry and Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.