W.J. Gelsema

54 papers receiving 567 citations

Peers

W.J. Gelsema
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Filtration and Separation 80
  • Spectroscopy 186
  • Bioengineering 48
  • Electrochemistry 41
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 140
Replace Francesca Cugia with:
Francesca Cugia Italy
Richard B. Simpson United States
Eugene J. Krob United States
Chau My Du United Kingdom
Sofia Gama Portugal
Т. Р. Усачева Russia
Yannis‐Nicolas François France
Karl J. Brunings Switzerland
Ione Weber United States
Douglas M. Rosie United States
W.J. Gelsema relative to Francesca Cugia Italy Francesca Cugia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.4×
Francesca Cugia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W.J. Gelsema

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W.J. Gelsema's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.J. Gelsema with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.J. Gelsema more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W.J. Gelsema

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.J. Gelsema. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.J. Gelsema. The network helps show where W.J. Gelsema may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside W.J. Gelsema, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W.J. Gelsema Line = papers co-authored together W.J. Gelsema links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196672
2 197951
3 199037
4 197733
5 196733
6 197833
7 197930
8 196527
9 197726
10 198221
11 198419
12 197617
13 198616
14 197514
15 198513
16 198610
17 199010
18 19809
19 19888
20 19868

About W.J. Gelsema

W.J. Gelsema is a scholar working on Filtration and Separation, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Spectroscopy, Analytical Chemistry and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 55 papers that have together received 626 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (21 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (14 papers), Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies (14 papers), Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions (11 papers), Crystallization and Solubility Studies (8 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Characterization (7 papers), Chromatography in Natural Products (7 papers) and Protein purification and stability (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Filtration and Separation (80 citations), Spectroscopy (186 citations), Bioengineering (48 citations), Electrochemistry (41 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (140 citations). W.J. Gelsema has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Czechia and Poland. Frequent co-authors include C. Leo de Ligny, N.G. van der Veen, A. G. Remijnse, Jan Kroesbergen, Jordy Luten, A.G.M. Theeuwes, Willem M. Blanken, Jaap Adriaan Bakker, Stephan H. D. Hulleman and R.J. Hamer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chromatography A, Journal of Chromatographic Science, Journal of Lipid Research, Separation Science and Technology and Analytical Biochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact