Winifred Mark

526 citations
9 papers · 398 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Winifred Mark

8 papers receiving 370 citations

Peers

Winifred Mark
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 110
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 100
  • Statistics and Probability 57
  • Social Psychology 99
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 63
Replace Karin Bakračevič with:
Karin Bakračevič Slovenia
María Rosa Elosúa de Juan Spain
Marie Izaute France
Ramzi Hasson United States
Celal Perihan United States
Quintino R. Mano United States
Peter Baggetta United States
Milton J. Dehn United States
Agnese Capodieci Italy
Agnieszka Jaroslawska United Kingdom
Winifred Mark relative to Karin Bakračevič Slovenia Karin Bakračevič's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Karin Bakračevič · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Winifred Mark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Winifred Mark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Winifred Mark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Winifred Mark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Winifred Mark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Winifred Mark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Winifred Mark. The network helps show where Winifred Mark may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Winifred Mark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Winifred Mark Line = papers co-authored together Winifred Mark links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2015123
2 201986
3
The Efficacy of Psychophysiological Measures for Implementing Adaptive Technology
200175
4 201735
5 201534
6 201525
7
Empirical Analysis of EEG and ERPs for Pyschophysiological Adaptive Task Allocation
200119
8 20141
9 20140

About Winifred Mark

Winifred Mark is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 9 papers that have together received 398 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (2 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (2 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (1 paper), Microbial Inactivation Methods (1 paper) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (110 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (100 citations), Statistics and Probability (57 citations), Social Psychology (99 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (63 citations). Winifred Mark has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Timothea Toulopoulou, Ann Dowker, Olivia M. Cheriton, Rachel Horton, Jessica Peter, Raja Parasuraman, Pearl Chen, Xi Li, Cecilia Leung and Jim van Os. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, Educational Studies in Mathematics, Frontiers in Psychology, Current Opinion in Neurobiology and Schizophrenia Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact