Wing‐Sze Lo

28 papers receiving 872 citations

Peers

Wing‐Sze Lo
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Pharmacy 67
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 267
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 107
  • Gastroenterology 40
  • Biological Psychiatry 17
Replace Marcel den Hoed with:
Marcel den Hoed Sweden
Myra O’Regan Ireland
Lisa M. Nackers United States
Claudia Talero‐Gutiérrez Colombia
D. Jill Shaddy United States
Nancy L. Pedersen Sweden
Aviva Mimouni-Bloch Israel
Edward D. Huntley United States
Akio Nakai Japan
Wing‐Sze Lo relative to Marcel den Hoed Sweden Marcel den Hoed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Marcel den Hoed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wing‐Sze Lo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wing‐Sze Lo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wing‐Sze Lo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wing‐Sze Lo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wing‐Sze Lo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wing‐Sze Lo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wing‐Sze Lo. The network helps show where Wing‐Sze Lo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wing‐Sze Lo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wing‐Sze Lo Line = papers co-authored together Wing‐Sze Lo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010117
2 201491
3 201265
4 201056
5 201442
6 201441
7 201038
8 200637
9 200731
10 201031
11 201229
12 201028
13 200927
14 201926
15 201226
16 200926
17 201025
18 200925
19 201125
20 201222

About Wing‐Sze Lo

Wing‐Sze Lo is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Pharmacy and Clinical Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 895 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (11 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (7 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (7 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (5 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (5 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (4 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (4 papers) and Physical Activity and Health (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (67 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (267 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (107 citations), Gastroenterology (40 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (17 citations). Wing‐Sze Lo has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include TH Lam, Sai Yin Ho, Kwok‐Kei Mak, G. Neil Thomas, Alison M. McManus, Zhiwen Xu, Jeffrey R. Day, Bonny Yee-Man Wong, Leslie A. Nangle and Paul Schimmel. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, BMC Public Health, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Sleep Medicine and Cellular and Molecular Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact