Win Tadd

38 papers receiving 670 citations

Peers

Win Tadd
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 31
  • Research and Theory 11
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 346
  • General Health Professions 302
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 8
Replace Anne Lise Holm with:
Anne Lise Holm Norway
Bethel Ann Powers United States
Sylvia K. Fields United States
Ireen M. Proot Netherlands
Oddvar Førland Norway
Margaret M. Ross Canada
Judith L. Howe United States
Mila Ann Aroskar United States
Jean Lange United States
Gabrielle Brand Australia
Win Tadd relative to Anne Lise Holm Norway Anne Lise Holm's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Anne Lise Holm · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Win Tadd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Win Tadd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Win Tadd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Win Tadd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Win Tadd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Win Tadd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Win Tadd. The network helps show where Win Tadd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Win Tadd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Win Tadd Line = papers co-authored together Win Tadd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200677
2 200576
3
Dignity in Practice: An exploration of the care of older adults in acute NHS Trusts
201170
4 201166
5 201256
6 200543
7 200542
8 201342
9 199240
10 201230
11
Views on dignity in providing health care for older people.
200528
12 199226
13 201024
14 200519
15 200213
16 200213
17 199213
18 201211
19 20058
20 20206

About Win Tadd

Win Tadd is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Health Information Management, having authored 39 papers that have together received 757 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient Dignity and Privacy (15 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (9 papers), Ethics in medical practice (9 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (5 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (4 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (2 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (31 citations), Research and Theory (11 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (346 citations), General Health Professions (302 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (8 citations). Win Tadd has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Antony Bayer, Ruth Chadwick, Michael Calnan, Alexandra Hillman, Simon Read, Paul Dieppe, Gillian Woolhead, Sergio Ariño‐Blasco, Mike Calnan and Chris Gastmans. Their work appears in journals such as Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, Nursing Ethics, Age and Ageing, Ageing and Society and Sociology of Health & Illness.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact