William Vine

36 papers receiving 999 citations

Peers

William Vine
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 100
  • Transplantation 39
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 200
  • Physiology 219
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 137
Replace Deborah L. Panebianco with:
Deborah L. Panebianco United States
Edward P. Nord United States
Jeremy C. Parker United Kingdom
Takeshi Yoshioka Japan
Norbert Kolassa Austria
Donald A. Giacherio United States
Alan H. Kosaka United States
David A. Ontjes United States
Randall R. Stoltz United States
Lise Kjems United States
William Vine relative to Deborah L. Panebianco United States Deborah L. Panebianco's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Deborah L. Panebianco · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Vine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Vine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Vine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Vine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Vine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Vine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Vine. The network helps show where William Vine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Vine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Vine Line = papers co-authored together William Vine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995159
2 1987116
3 1996115
4 198379
5 197077
6 198563
7 198754
8 199542
9 199139
10 199138
11 197234
12 197334
13 197930
14 198125
15 199320
16 199118
17 197318
18 199418
19 199617
20 198417

About William Vine

William Vine is a scholar working on Clinical Biochemistry, Hepatology, Transplantation, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Surgery, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic function and diabetes (6 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (6 papers), HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment (4 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (4 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (4 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (4 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (3 papers) and Renin-Angiotensin System Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (100 citations), Transplantation (39 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (200 citations), Physiology (219 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (137 citations). William Vine has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Japan. Frequent co-authors include TIMOTHY J. RINK, Bronislava R. Gedulin, Garland R. Marshall, Andrew A. Young, Anthony Cerami, Philip Needleman, P H Pekala, Masanobu Kawakami, Larry D. Bowers and Alejandro Zentella‐Dehesa. Their work appears in journals such as Hormone and Metabolic Research, Clinical Chemistry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Diabetologia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact