William Veeder
Impact in
-
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism
- American and British Literature Analysis
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
- History top 5%
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Papers in
-
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism 4
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 3
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies 2
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 2
-
- Gothic Literature and Media Analysis 2
William Veeder
17 papers receiving 70 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Literature and Literary Theory 111
- History 41
- Museology 10
- Philosophy 30
- Cultural Studies 21
Countries citing papers authored by William Veeder
This map shows the geographic impact of William Veeder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Veeder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Veeder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Veeder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Veeder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Veeder. The network helps show where William Veeder may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside William Veeder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Woman Question Society and Literature in Britain and America, 1837-1883 | 1989 | 38 |
| 2 | The Art of Criticism: Henry James on the Theory and the Practice of Fiction | 1986 | 27 |
| 3 | 1988 | 19 | |
| 4 | 1988 | 19 | |
| 5 | Henry James : the lessons of the master : popular fiction and personal style in the nineteenth century | 1975 | 16 |
| 6 | 1989 | 12 | |
| 7 | 1999 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1976 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1986 | 6 | |
| 10 | The woman question : defining voices, 1837-1883 | 1983 | 5 |
| 11 | 1988 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1991 | 4 | |
| 13 | Volume ... of the woman question : society and literature in Britain and America, 1837-1883 | 1983 | 3 |
| 14 | The woman question : literary issues, 1837-1883 | 1983 | 3 |
| 15 | 1971 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1993 | 3 | |
| 17 | The woman question : social issues, 1837-1883 | 1983 | 2 |
| 18 | 1991 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1998 | 1 |
About William Veeder
William Veeder is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Cultural Studies, Philosophy, Gender Studies and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 189 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Contemporary Literature and Criticism (4 papers), Science Education and Perceptions (3 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (2 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers), Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research (2 papers) and Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (111 citations), History (41 citations), Museology (10 citations), Philosophy (30 citations) and Cultural Studies (21 citations). Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth Helsinger, Henry James, Susan M. Griffin, Anne Janowitz and Sarah Deutsch. Their work appears in journals such as The Henry James review, The Modern Language Review, American Literature, Modern Philology and History of Education Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.