Daniel Cottom
Impact in
-
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism
- Crime and Detective Fiction Studies
- Narrative Theory and Analysis
- Modernist Literature and Criticism
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Gothic Literature and Media Analysis
Papers in
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 3
- German Literature and Culture Studies 2
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 2
-
- Gothic Literature and Media Analysis 5
Daniel Cottom
25 papers receiving 98 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Literature and Literary Theory 116
- Cultural Studies 40
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 18
- History 38
- Philosophy 23
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Cottom
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Cottom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Cottom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Cottom more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Cottom
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Cottom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Cottom. The network helps show where Daniel Cottom may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Cottom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1987 | 41 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 37 | |
| 3 | Social Figures: George Eliot, Social History, and Literary Representation | 1987 | 27 |
| 4 | The Civilized Imagination: A Study of Ann Radcliffe, Jane Austen and Sir Walter Scott | 1985 | 15 |
| 5 | 2003 | 13 | |
| 6 | Text and Culture: The Politics of Interpretation | 1989 | 12 |
| 7 | 1985 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1991 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1980 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2001 | 6 | |
| 12 | International Bohemia: Scenes of Nineteenth-Century Life | 2013 | 4 |
| 13 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1999 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 3 | |
| 18 | Ravishing Tradition: Cultural Forces and Literary History | 1996 | 2 |
| 19 | 1985 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1980 | 2 |
About Daniel Cottom
Daniel Cottom is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Cultural Studies, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Philosophy and Museology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 220 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (5 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers), German Literature and Culture Studies (2 papers), Central European national history (2 papers), Law in Society and Culture (2 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (2 papers) and Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (116 citations), Cultural Studies (40 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (18 citations), History (38 citations) and Philosophy (23 citations). Frequent co-authors include Diane Long Hoeveler and David Punter. Their work appears in journals such as ELH, Representations, Studies in Romanticism, NOVEL A Forum on Fiction and Critical Inquiry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.