Countries where authors publish in NOVEL A Forum on Fiction
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in NOVEL A Forum on Fiction. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in NOVEL A Forum on Fiction with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites NOVEL A Forum on Fiction more than expected).
Fields of papers published in NOVEL A Forum on Fiction
This network shows the impact of papers published in NOVEL A Forum on Fiction. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in NOVEL A Forum on Fiction.
About NOVEL A Forum on Fiction
The 1.0k papers published in NOVEL A Forum on Fiction in the last decades have received a total of 3.9k indexed citations . Papers published in NOVEL A Forum on Fiction usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (584 papers), Cultural Studies (86 papers), History (88 papers), Philosophy (89 papers) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (38 papers) specifically the topics of Contemporary Literature and Criticism (164 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (94 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (84 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (67 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (64 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (63 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (51 papers) and Themes in Literature Analysis (48 papers). The most active scholars publishing in NOVEL A Forum on Fiction are Barbara Hardy, Tzvetan Todorov, Arnold Weinstein, Leo Braudy, Rita Barnard, Derek Attridge, Nancy Armstrong, Rebecca L. Walkowitz, Clifford Siskin and Bruce Robbins.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.