William Schiff

2.1k citations
35 papers · 1.7k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

William Schiff

32 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

William Schiff
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 983
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 451
  • Human-Computer Interaction 120
  • Social Psychology 393
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 214
Replace James M. Polt with:
James M. Polt United States
Alberta S. Gilinsky United States
Alfred B. Kristofferson Canada
D. N. Lee United Kingdom
Joseph S. Lappin United States
Frank Arthur Geldard United States
John B. Pittenger United States
Sverker Runeson Sweden
Roger J. Watt United Kingdom
Alinda Friedman Canada
William Schiff relative to James M. Polt United States James M. Polt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
James M. Polt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Schiff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Schiff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Schiff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Schiff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Schiff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Schiff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Schiff. The network helps show where William Schiff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside William Schiff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Schiff Line = papers co-authored together William Schiff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1962335
2 1979319
3 1983267
4 1965233
5 197558
6
Perception: An applied approach
198053
7 198649
8 196448
9 200135
10 197429
11 196923
12 197223
13 196619
14 196818
15 197318
16 197216
17 199414
18 197314
19 197712
20 198311

About William Schiff

William Schiff is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology and Developmental Biology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Impairment and Communication (8 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (5 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (5 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (4 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (3 papers), Safety Warnings and Signage (3 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (983 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (451 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (120 citations), Social Psychology (393 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (214 citations). William Schiff has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include James J. Gibson, James A. Caviness, Frank Arthur Geldard, Emerson Foulke, Stephen D. Thayer, Eleanor J. Gibson, APRIL ANN BENASICH, Marc H. Bornstein and Carolyn Ingrid Saarni. Their work appears in journals such as Rehabilitation Psychology, The Journal of Social Psychology, Science, Child Development and Exceptional Children.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact