William Roche

407 citations
32 papers · 226 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

William Roche

29 papers receiving 176 citations

Peers

William Roche
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • History and Philosophy of Science 141
  • General Decision Sciences 20
  • Philosophy 123
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 53
  • Artificial Intelligence 82
Replace Jeanne Peijnenburg with:
Jeanne Peijnenburg Netherlands
Thomas Blanchard United States
Jonathan Weisberg Canada
David Lewis United States
Bernhard Salow United States
Luca Moretti United Kingdom
Benjamin A. Levinstein United States
Igal Kvart Israel
Jeffrey Sanford Russell United States
Ken Gemes United Kingdom
William Roche relative to Jeanne Peijnenburg Netherlands Jeanne Peijnenburg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11×
Jeanne Peijnenburg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Roche

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Roche's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Roche with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Roche more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Roche

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Roche. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Roche. The network helps show where William Roche may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside William Roche, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Roche Line = papers co-authored together William Roche links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201329
2 201424
3 201819
4 201119
5 201317
6 201413
7 201312
8 201211
9 20169
10 20178
11 20097
12 20117
13 20126
14 20156
15 20155
16 20195
17 20135
18
Can A Coherentist Be An Externalist?
20064
19 20184
20
Inference to the Best Explanation and the Screening-Off Challenge
20193

About William Roche

William Roche is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 32 papers that have together received 226 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (24 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (16 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (11 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (4 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers), Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2 papers) and Free Will and Agency (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (141 citations), General Decision Sciences (20 citations), Philosophy (123 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (53 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (82 citations). William Roche has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Elliott Sober and Tomoji Shogenji. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Philosophy of Science, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, Erkenntnis and Philosophical Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact