William Press

1.5k citations
15 papers · 1.3k · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

William Press

15 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

William Press
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 524
  • Immunology and Allergy 131
  • Rehabilitation 111
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 209
  • Genetics 223
Replace Laura Morando with:
Laura Morando Italy
Fátima Pedrosa Domellöf Sweden
Ailey Crow United States
David C. Edwards United States
Steven A. Crone United States
Sigrid Henke‐Fahle Germany
Steven H. Laval United Kingdom
Clare Galtrey United Kingdom
Andrew Lowe United Kingdom
Hakima Moukhles Canada
William Press relative to Laura Morando Italy Laura Morando's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Laura Morando · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Press

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Press's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Press with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Press more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Press

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Press. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Press. The network helps show where William Press may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Press, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Press Line = papers co-authored together William Press links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 1986272
2 2002171
3 2001167
4 1992132
5 1993117
6 2018111
7 201771
8 199962
9 199039
10 202036
11 200331
12 201516
13 200113
14
A large-scale, orthogonal network of microfibril bundles in the corneal stroma.
19879
15
The generation of anchoring fibrils by epidermal keratinocytes: a quantitative long-term study.
19959

About William Press

William Press is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics and Rehabilitation, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (2 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (2 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (2 papers) and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (524 citations), Immunology and Allergy (131 citations), Rehabilitation (111 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (209 citations) and Genetics (223 citations). William Press has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Brian A. Wandell, Alyssa A. Brewer, Romaine R. Bruns, J Gross, Eva Engvall, Rupert Timpl, Mark F. Bear, Robert F. Dougherty, Barry W. Connors and Nikos K. Logothetis. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Cell stem cell, The Journal of Cell Biology, The Lancet and Experimental Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact