William Phu
Impact in
- Genetics top 5%
- Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer
- Forensic and Genetic Research
- Clinical Biochemistry top 10%
Papers in
- Genetics 5
- Genomics and Rare Diseases 5
- Evolution and Genetic Dynamics 1
-
- Cell Image Analysis Techniques 1
- Co-authors
- Moriel Singer‐Berk (1 shared paper)Anne O’Donnell‐Luria (1 shared paper)Daniel G. MacArthur (1 shared paper)Julia K. Goodrich (1 shared paper)Heidi L. Rehm (1 shared paper)Matthew Solomonson (1 shared paper)Sanna Gudmundsson (1 shared paper)Nicholas A. Watts (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Nature Communications (2 papers)Human Mutation (2 papers)Nature (1 paper)JCO Precision Oncology (1 paper)Nature Neuroscience (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFinlandSpain
In The Last Decade
William Phu
9 papers receiving 1.6k citations
William Phu's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Genetics 763
- Clinical Biochemistry 36
- Molecular Biology 377
- Cancer Research 68
- Sensory Systems 26
Countries citing papers authored by William Phu
This map shows the geographic impact of William Phu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Phu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Phu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Phu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Phu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Phu. The network helps show where William Phu may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside William Phu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A genomic mutational constraint map using variation in 76,156 human genomes Hit paper breakdown → | 2023 | 966 |
| 2 | Variant interpretation using population databases: Lessons from gnomAD Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 405 |
| 3 | 2022 | 68 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 67 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2025 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2026 | 1 |
About William Phu
William Phu is a scholar working on Genetics, Biophysics, Reproductive Medicine, Cancer Research and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 9 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Rare Diseases (5 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (1 paper), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (1 paper), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper), Reproductive Health and Technologies (1 paper), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (1 paper), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (1 paper) and Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (763 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (36 citations), Molecular Biology (377 citations), Cancer Research (68 citations) and Sensory Systems (26 citations). William Phu has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Finland and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Moriel Singer‐Berk, Anne O’Donnell‐Luria, Daniel G. MacArthur, Julia K. Goodrich, Heidi L. Rehm, Matthew Solomonson, Sanna Gudmundsson, Nicholas A. Watts, Marcos Meseguer and Kathleen A. Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Human Mutation, Nature, JCO Precision Oncology and Nature Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.