William Nash

429 citations
16 papers · 310 · h-index 9

Impact in

  • Neurology top 10%
    • Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
    • Immune Cell Function and Interaction
    • T-cell and B-cell Immunology
    • IL-33, ST2, and ILC Pathways

Papers in

    • Immune Cell Function and Interaction 6
    • T-cell and B-cell Immunology 5
    • Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research 5

William Nash

15 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers

William Nash
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Neurology 65
  • Immunology 127
  • Nephrology 21
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 19
  • Molecular Biology 111
Replace Gabriel J. Popa with:
Gabriel J. Popa United States
Odell D. Jones United States
Adrian Caplanusi Belgium
Kristopher L. Schmidt Canada
Karolynn Hsu Canada
Jennifer N. Clarke Australia
Meredith Gregory‐Ksander United States
Tobias Hoegen Germany
Michelle Chung United States
Rajprasad Loganathan United States
William Nash relative to Gabriel J. Popa United States Gabriel J. Popa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Gabriel J. Popa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Nash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Nash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Nash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Nash. The network helps show where William Nash may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Nash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Nash Line = papers co-authored together William Nash links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 202299
2 202187
3 201431
4 201915
5 201412
6 201311
7 198111
8 201810
9 20168
10 20217
11 20205
12 19985
13 20224
14 20173
15 20252
16 20220

About William Nash

William Nash is a scholar working on Immunology, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology, Neurology and Surgery, having authored 16 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Immune Cell Function and Interaction (6 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (5 papers), Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (5 papers), Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research (3 papers), Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (1 paper) and Insect and Pesticide Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (65 citations), Immunology (127 citations), Nephrology (21 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (19 citations) and Molecular Biology (111 citations). William Nash has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael G. Brown, Mark D. Okusa, Hairong Wei, Vivien I. Maltez, Heather N. Larson, Nathaniel J. Moorman, Edward A. Miao, Manira Rayamajhi, Kengo Nozaki and Carolyn A. Lacey. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Immunology, American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Frontiers in Immunology and European Journal of Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact