William Monteith
Impact in
- Urban Studies top 5%
Papers in
-
- Protein Structure and Dynamics 6
-
- Anthropological Studies and Insights 4
- African history and culture studies 2
- Co-authors
- Gary J. Pielak (4 shared papers)Peter B. Crowley (1 shared paper)Ciara Kyne (1 shared paper)Austin E. Smith (1 shared paper)Rachel D. Cohen (1 shared paper)Lena Giesbert (1 shared paper)Laura Camfield (2 shared papers)Christopher O. Barnes (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2 papers)Work Employment and Society (2 papers)Africa (2 papers)Antipode (2 papers)Urban Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
William Monteith
20 papers receiving 625 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Business and International Management 14
- Urban Studies 35
- Molecular Biology 387
- Biophysics 33
- Spectroscopy 86
Countries citing papers authored by William Monteith
This map shows the geographic impact of William Monteith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Monteith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Monteith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Monteith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Monteith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Monteith. The network helps show where William Monteith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside William Monteith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 173 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 124 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 104 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 25 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 21 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 21 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2025 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 1 |
About William Monteith
William Monteith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science, Materials Chemistry and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 22 papers that have together received 646 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protein Structure and Dynamics (6 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (5 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (4 papers), Water Governance and Infrastructure (4 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (3 papers), African history and culture studies (2 papers), Urban and Rural Development Challenges (2 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (14 citations), Urban Studies (35 citations), Molecular Biology (387 citations), Biophysics (33 citations) and Spectroscopy (86 citations). William Monteith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Gary J. Pielak, Peter B. Crowley, Ciara Kyne, Austin E. Smith, Rachel D. Cohen, Lena Giesbert, Laura Camfield, Christopher O. Barnes, Shuaib Lwasa and Allison S. Danell. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Work Employment and Society, Africa, Antipode and Urban Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.