William Ling

15 papers receiving 366 citations

Peers

William Ling
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Gastroenterology 98
  • Pharmacy 41
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 106
  • Applied Psychology 20
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 56
Replace Elyse R. Thakur with:
Elyse R. Thakur United States
Toshiya Iketani Japan
Steven A. Kvaal United States
Sarah Kinsinger United States
Virginia Attanasio United States
Susan T. Tran United States
Lakshmi Fernandes United Kingdom
O. Berndt Scholz Germany
Indira Varia United States
Atefeh Ghanbari Jolfaei Iran
William Ling relative to Elyse R. Thakur United States Elyse R. Thakur's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Elyse R. Thakur · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Ling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Ling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Ling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Ling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Ling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Ling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Ling. The network helps show where William Ling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside William Ling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Ling Line = papers co-authored together William Ling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 1999131
2 199862
3 199646
4 199544
5 199733
6 199624
7 198614
8 198412
9 19888
10
Interferon-gamma inhibits in situ expression of PDGF-beta mRNA by smooth muscle cells in injured rabbit arteries after transluminal balloon angioplasty.
20016
11 19855
12 20014
13 20013
14 19892
15 19892

About William Ling

William Ling is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Behavioral Neuroscience, Gastroenterology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 396 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (3 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (3 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (2 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (2 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (2 papers), Multimedia Communication and Technology (2 papers) and Usability and User Interface Design (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (98 citations), Pharmacy (41 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (106 citations), Applied Psychology (20 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (56 citations). William Ling has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Daniel J. Cox, James L. Sutphen, Cheryl Colecchi, Charles M. Morin, Philippe Landreville, Jackie Stone, Boris Kovatchev, Stephen M. Borowitz, David F. Bohr and Yoram Shenker. Their work appears in journals such as Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, Professional Psychology Research and Practice, Experimental Biology and Medicine, Annals of Behavioral Medicine and Journal of Hypertension.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact