Michael Mendle
Impact in
- History top 0.5%
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
- Scottish History and National Identity
- European Political History Analysis
- Philosophy top 2%
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Papers in
- History 7
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 4
- Scottish History and National Identity 3
- Historical Studies of British Isles 2
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 7
- Co-authors
- Clayton Roberts (1 shared paper)Markku Peltonen (1 shared paper)Will Coster (1 shared paper)Ian J. Gentles (1 shared paper)William E. Palmer (1 shared paper)Carole Levin (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (4 papers)The Historical Journal (2 papers)Parliamentary History (2 papers)The Journal of Military History (1 paper)Journal of British Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Michael Mendle
16 papers receiving 308 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- History 256
- Philosophy 128
- Political Science and International Relations 262
- Literature and Literary Theory 54
- Anthropology 43
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Mendle
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Mendle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Mendle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Mendle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Mendle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Mendle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Mendle. The network helps show where Michael Mendle may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Michael Mendle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pamphlets and Pamphleteering in Early Modern Britain | 2005 | 110 |
| 2 | 1995 | 78 | |
| 3 | 1986 | 67 | |
| 4 | 1993 | 58 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 48 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 34 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 15 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1990 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1989 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1997 | 4 | |
| 12 | 1973 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1986 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1991 | 0 | |
| 19 | 1989 | 0 |
About Michael Mendle
Michael Mendle is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations, Museology, History and Philosophy of Science and Finance, having authored 19 papers that have together received 448 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (7 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (4 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (3 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (2 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper), Financial Crisis of the 21st Century (1 paper) and Australian History and Society (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (256 citations), Philosophy (128 citations), Political Science and International Relations (262 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (54 citations) and Anthropology (43 citations). Michael Mendle has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Clayton Roberts, Markku Peltonen, Will Coster, Ian J. Gentles, William E. Palmer and Carole Levin. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Historical Journal, Parliamentary History, The Journal of Military History and Journal of British Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.