William Keys
Impact in
- Oral Surgery top 2%
- Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
- Dental Radiography and Imaging
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Papers in
-
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 4
- Neural dynamics and brain function 3
-
- Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes 2
- Co-authors
- David Robinson (3 shared papers)Mark-Steven Howe (1 shared paper)Derek Richards (1 shared paper)Steven L. Petersen (1 shared paper)Steven E. Petersen (1 shared paper)David Ricketts (1 shared paper)Michaelina Macluskey (1 shared paper)Timothy D. Johnston (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Experimental Brain Research (1 paper)BDJ (1 paper)Journal of Neurophysiology (1 paper)European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry (1 paper)Journal of Dentistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
William Keys
11 papers receiving 756 citations
William Keys's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Oral Surgery 294
- Cognitive Neuroscience 355
- Orthodontics 67
- General Dentistry 11
- Urology 41
Countries citing papers authored by William Keys
This map shows the geographic impact of William Keys's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Keys with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Keys more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Keys
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Keys. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Keys. The network helps show where William Keys may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside William Keys, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Long-term (10-year) dental implant survival: A systematic review and sensitivity meta-analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 370 |
| 2 | 1985 | 312 | |
| 3 | 1986 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 6 | 1979 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1981 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1968 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1981 | 1 |
About William Keys
William Keys is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Oral Surgery, Molecular Biology, Otorhinolaryngology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 12 papers that have together received 782 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (2 papers), Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (2 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers), Oral health in cancer treatment (2 papers), Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies (1 paper) and Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oral Surgery (294 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (355 citations), Orthodontics (67 citations), General Dentistry (11 citations) and Urology (41 citations). William Keys has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include David Robinson, Mark-Steven Howe, Derek Richards, Steven L. Petersen, Steven E. Petersen, David Ricketts, Michaelina Macluskey, Timothy D. Johnston, G. B. Harrison and Martha Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Brain Research, BDJ, Journal of Neurophysiology, European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry and Journal of Dentistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.