William K. Smith

13.5k citations
238 papers · 11.2k · h-index 60

Impact in

Papers in

William K. Smith

237 papers receiving 10.0k citations

Peers

William K. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 175
  • Global and Planetary Change 5.1k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.8k
  • Atmospheric Science 2.6k
  • Plant Science 5.0k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.8k
Replace Walter Larcher with:
Walter Larcher Austria
N. Michèle Holbrook United States
O. L. Lange Germany
Robert W. Pearcy United States
Steven Jansen Germany
Colin P. Osborne United Kingdom
Park S. Nobel United States
T. T. Kozlowski United States
Martyn M. Caldwell United States
Dan Yakir Israel
William K. Smith relative to Walter Larcher Austria Walter Larcher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Walter Larcher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William K. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William K. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William K. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William K. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William K. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William K. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William K. Smith. The network helps show where William K. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William K. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William K. Smith Line = papers co-authored together William K. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 238 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001343
2 1997330
3 2002314
4 1975264
5 1981240
6 1991231
7 1996218
8 1999206
9 1986200
10 2015186
11 1978166
12 1997165
13 2009164
14 2000163
15 1991157
16 1989153
17 2014139
18 1983137
19 2007131
20 2007131

About William K. Smith

William K. Smith is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Atmospheric Science, having authored 238 papers that have together received 11.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (100 papers), Plant responses to elevated CO2 (56 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (40 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (29 papers), Plant and animal studies (17 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (17 papers), Forest ecology and management (14 papers) and Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (5.1k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.8k citations), Atmospheric Science (2.6k citations), Plant Science (5.0k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.8k citations). William K. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Matthew J. Germino, Alan K. Knapp, Thomas C. Vogelmann, Carol A. Brewer, Park S. Nobel, Nicole M. Hughes, Evan H. DeLucia, Donald R. Young, Daniel M. Johnson and Gregory A. Carter. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Botany, Oecologia, Tree Physiology, Plant Cell & Environment and Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact