William K. Smith

13.5k citations
224 papers · 10.0k · h-index 58

Impact in

Papers in

William K. Smith

223 papers receiving 9.2k citations

Peers

William K. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 172
  • Global and Planetary Change 4.7k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.5k
  • Atmospheric Science 2.3k
  • Plant Science 4.4k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.6k
Replace Walter Larcher with:
Walter Larcher Austria
N. Michèle Holbrook United States
O. L. Lange Germany
Robert W. Pearcy United States
Colin P. Osborne United Kingdom
Steven Jansen Germany
Martyn M. Caldwell United States
Park S. Nobel United States
T. T. Kozlowski United States
Guillermo Goldstein United States
William K. Smith relative to Walter Larcher Austria Walter Larcher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Walter Larcher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William K. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William K. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William K. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William K. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William K. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William K. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William K. Smith. The network helps show where William K. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William K. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William K. Smith Line = papers co-authored together William K. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 224 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001316
2 2002303
3 1997302
4 1975229
5 1991206
6 1981198
7 1999193
8 1996188
9 2015182
10 1986176
11 2000158
12 1978153
13 2009153
14 1997150
15 1989145
16 1991141
17 2014135
18 1983122
19 2007120
20 1982113

About William K. Smith

William K. Smith is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Atmospheric Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 224 papers that have together received 10.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (95 papers), Plant responses to elevated CO2 (54 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (37 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (27 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (16 papers), Plant and animal studies (15 papers), Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement (13 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (4.7k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.5k citations), Atmospheric Science (2.3k citations), Plant Science (4.4k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.6k citations). William K. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include Matthew J. Germino, Alan K. Knapp, Thomas C. Vogelmann, Carol A. Brewer, Nicole M. Hughes, Park S. Nobel, Evan H. DeLucia, Daniel M. Johnson, Donald R. Young and Z. Carter Berry. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Botany, Oecologia, Tree Physiology, Ecology and Plant Cell & Environment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact