William Joo
Impact in
- Developmental Neuroscience top 10%
- Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Papers in
-
- Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation 3
- Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics 2
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 2
- Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling 2
- Nerve injury and regeneration 1
- Co-authors
- Liqun Luo (5 shared papers)Simon Hippenmeyer (3 shared papers)Celia E. Shiau (1 shared paper)Kelly R. Monk (1 shared paper)William S. Talbot (1 shared paper)Lora B. Sweeney (2 shared papers)Liang Liang (1 shared paper)Zhuhao Wu (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Neuron (2 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)Developmental Biology (1 paper)Science (1 paper)Cell Reports (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
William Joo
8 papers receiving 392 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Developmental Neuroscience 49
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 186
- Neurology 49
- Cell Biology 82
- Immunology 92
Countries citing papers authored by William Joo
This map shows the geographic impact of William Joo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Joo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Joo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Joo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Joo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Joo. The network helps show where William Joo may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside William Joo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 95 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 84 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 61 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 49 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 48 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 7 |
About William Joo
William Joo is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics, Immunology and Neurology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (3 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (2 papers), Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (2 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (1 paper), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (1 paper), Nerve injury and regeneration (1 paper) and Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (49 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (186 citations), Neurology (49 citations), Cell Biology (82 citations) and Immunology (92 citations). William Joo has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Liqun Luo, Simon Hippenmeyer, Celia E. Shiau, Kelly R. Monk, William S. Talbot, Lora B. Sweeney, Liang Liang, Zhuhao Wu, Takaki Komiyama and Alex L. Kolodkin. Their work appears in journals such as Neuron, PLoS ONE, Developmental Biology, Science and Cell Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.