William Hanf

985 citations
30 papers · 311 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

    • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes 9
    • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments 10

William Hanf

27 papers receiving 283 citations

Peers

William Hanf
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Transplantation 116
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 85
  • Nephrology 37
  • Geometry and Topology 40
  • Medical Terminology 1
Replace Mikki Ozawa with:
Mikki Ozawa United States
Aline C. Hemke Netherlands
S. Witte Germany
David Lowe United Kingdom
Ruba Y. Taha Qatar
Chaitali Passey United States
David Wojciechowski United States
S. A. Hunt United States
Jiankui Li China
Luiz Cláudio Demes da Mata Sousa Brazil
William Hanf relative to Mikki Ozawa United States Mikki Ozawa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.2×
Mikki Ozawa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Hanf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Hanf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Hanf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Hanf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Hanf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Hanf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Hanf. The network helps show where William Hanf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Hanf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Hanf Line = papers co-authored together William Hanf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200950
2 196433
3 195727
4 201227
5 201425
6 201820
7 197418
8 201516
9 197513
10 201412
11 201311
12 201110
13 20179
14
Some fundamental problems concerning languages with infinitely long expressions
19638
15 20107
16 19645
17 20204
18 20153
19 19833
20 20132

About William Hanf

William Hanf is a scholar working on Surgery, Transplantation, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 30 papers that have together received 311 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (10 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (9 papers), semigroups and automata theory (5 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (3 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (3 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (3 papers) and Renal and Vascular Pathologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (116 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (85 citations), Nephrology (37 citations), Geometry and Topology (40 citations) and Medical Terminology (1 citation). William Hanf has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Emmanuel Morélon, P Coates, Brigitte McGregor, Claudine S. Bonder, Cécile Chauvet, R. Codas, Olivier Thaunat, Jean-Louis Touraine, Valérie Dubois and Palmina Petruzzo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Symbolic Logic, Transplant International, Clinical Kidney Journal, Clinical Nephrology and BMC Nephrology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact