William E. Trout

39 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

William E. Trout
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Aging 86
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 365
  • Small Animals 205
  • Animal Science and Zoology 220
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 281
Replace Loýs Bodin with:
Loýs Bodin France
V. G. Smith United States
A. Iritani Japan
W. H. McShan United States
L.A. Zarazaga Spain
J.A. Proudman United States
V. Carcangiu Italy
Xavier Vignon France
S.P. Lerner United States
P. MAULÉON France
William E. Trout relative to Loýs Bodin France Loýs Bodin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
Loýs Bodin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Trout

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Trout's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Trout with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Trout more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Trout

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Trout. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Trout. The network helps show where William E. Trout may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William E. Trout, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Trout Line = papers co-authored together William E. Trout links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1969260
2 201688
3 197082
4 201780
5 201965
6 199861
7
Embryo-uterine interactions in pigs during week 2 of pregnancy.
199357
8 199047
9 198346
10 199246
11 199142
12 199231
13 199024
14 197424
15
Stimulation of food intake and growth of swine by cholecystokinin immunization.
199023
16 197320
17 199419
18 198719
19 198417
20 198916

About William E. Trout

William E. Trout is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (15 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (6 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (5 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (4 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (4 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (4 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (4 papers) and Coccidia and coccidiosis research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (86 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (365 citations), Small Animals (205 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (220 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (281 citations). William E. Trout has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William D. Kaplan, R. Michael Roberts, B. D. Schanbacher, R. Michael Roberts, R. K. Christenson, Sancai Xie, Melody Stallings‐Mann, Jerome C. Pekas, P.V. Malven and Harold G. Klemcke. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, Genetics, Experimental Gerontology, Animal Reproduction Science and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact