William E. Cole

32 papers receiving 227 citations

Peers

William E. Cole
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Architecture 6
  • Urban Studies 19
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 26
  • Economics and Econometrics 77
  • Sociology and Political Science 115
Replace Richard Kazis with:
Richard Kazis
Janet Hunter United Kingdom
Banque Interaméricaine de Développement
Willy Brandt United States
L. Neville Brown United Kingdom
Ian Boxill Jamaica
Yahya M. Madra United States
Victor Sulla United States
Monageng Mogalakwe Botswana
Adolfo Figueroa Peru
William E. Cole relative to Richard Kazis Richard Kazis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Richard Kazis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Cole

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Cole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Cole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Cole more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Cole

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Cole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Cole. The network helps show where William E. Cole may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William E. Cole, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Cole Line = papers co-authored together William E. Cole links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197185
2 196450
3 201522
4 199120
5 198314
6
The Economics of Total Quality Management: Clashing Paradigms in the Global Market
199513
7 198712
8 19699
9 19949
10 19946
11 19716
12 19945
13 19565
14
Social foundations of education
19684
15 20094
16 19794
17 19663
18 19683
19
Internal Migration and Urban Employment: Reply
20162
20 19742

About William E. Cole

William E. Cole is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Architecture, Media Technology and Urban Studies, having authored 38 papers that have together received 296 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Growth and Productivity (4 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (3 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (3 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (2 papers), Global trade and economics (2 papers), Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (2 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (2 papers) and Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Architecture (6 citations), Urban Studies (19 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (26 citations), Economics and Econometrics (77 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (115 citations). William E. Cole has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Elliott Currie, Jerome H. Skolnick, Robert C. Wood, Bichaka Fayissa, Richard D. Sanders, Albert O. Hirschman, Chris Doran, Edward J. Larson, Brian Newman and James L. Guth. Their work appears in journals such as Social Forces, American Sociological Review, World Development, Journal of Economic Issues and African Studies Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact