William E. Bynum

27 papers receiving 879 citations

Peers

William E. Bynum
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Family Practice 48
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 178
  • General Health Professions 156
  • Research and Theory 5
  • Plant Science 237
Replace Juping Yu with:
Juping Yu United Kingdom
Craig Irvine United States
Nicole J. J. M. Mastenbroek Netherlands
Susan M. Matthew United States
Sylvia Claassen Enns Brazil
Barbara Heise United States
Mario Veen Netherlands
Leslie K. Robbins United States
Dong Hee Kim South Korea
Gonca Karayağız Muslu Türkiye
William E. Bynum relative to Juping Yu United Kingdom Juping Yu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Juping Yu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Bynum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Bynum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Bynum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Bynum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Bynum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Bynum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Bynum. The network helps show where William E. Bynum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William E. Bynum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Bynum Line = papers co-authored together William E. Bynum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008258
2 201895
3 201680
4 201475
5 201674
6 201764
7 202050
8 202031
9 201631
10 202129
11 201725
12 201522
13 202317
14 202014
15 202011
16 20199
17 20236
18 20135
19 20253
20 20242

About William E. Bynum

William E. Bynum is a scholar working on Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 29 papers that have together received 909 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emotions and Moral Behavior (8 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (4 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (4 papers), Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (2 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (1 paper), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper) and Plant Gene Expression Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (48 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (178 citations), General Health Professions (156 citations), Research and Theory (5 citations) and Plant Science (237 citations). William E. Bynum has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Lara Varpio, Kristen K. Dang, Ben F. Holt, Roderick W. Kumimoto, Daniel A. Hashimoto, Anthony R. Artino, Jeffrey L. Goodie, Pim W. Teunissen, Sebastian Uijtdehaage and Kathleen M. McKenna. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, Medical Education, Perspectives on Medical Education, JAMA Network Open and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact