William E. Bynum

27 papers receiving 840 citations

Peers

William E. Bynum
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Family Practice 89
  • Research and Theory 11
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 338
  • Gender Studies 100
  • General Health Professions 263
Replace Ashraf Uddin Ahmed with:
Ashraf Uddin Ahmed Bangladesh
Juping Yu United Kingdom
Nicole J. J. M. Mastenbroek Netherlands
Donnie J. Self United States
Liz Mossop United Kingdom
Jennifer G. Christner United States
Lynn Knight United Kingdom
J. Kevin Dorsey United States
Emma Bartle Australia
Kelly Underman United States
William E. Bynum relative to Ashraf Uddin Ahmed Bangladesh Ashraf Uddin Ahmed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Ashraf Uddin Ahmed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Bynum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Bynum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Bynum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Bynum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Bynum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Bynum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Bynum. The network helps show where William E. Bynum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William E. Bynum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Bynum Line = papers co-authored together William E. Bynum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008251
2 201893
3 201678
4 201673
5 201467
6 201756
7 202047
8 202031
9 201629
10 202128
11 201725
12 201522
13 202315
14 202014
15 202010
16 20199
17 20135
18 20235
19 20252
20 20241

About William E. Bynum

William E. Bynum is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 28 papers that have together received 868 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (11 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (10 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (8 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (7 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (5 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (3 papers), Psychological Treatments and Assessments (2 papers) and Diversity and Career in Medicine (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (89 citations), Research and Theory (11 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (338 citations), Gender Studies (100 citations) and General Health Professions (263 citations). William E. Bynum has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Lara Varpio, Ben F. Holt, Roderick W. Kumimoto, Kristen K. Dang, Daniel A. Hashimoto, Anthony R. Artino, Jeffrey L. Goodie, Pim W. Teunissen, Sebastian Uijtdehaage and Kathleen M. McKenna. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, Medical Education, Perspectives on Medical Education, JAMA Network Open and PLANT PHYSIOLOGY.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact