William Ching

1.8k citations
16 papers · 1.5k · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

William Ching

15 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

William Ching
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Developmental Neuroscience 320
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 595
  • Oral Surgery 167
  • Neurology 113
  • Orthodontics 54
Replace Susan Y. Fu with:
Susan Y. Fu United States
Hideki Yoshikawa Japan
R.S.B. Liem Netherlands
Sabine Kuchler‐Bopp France
Takeyuki Yamamoto Japan
Micaela Grandolfo Italy
Christopher A. Nosrat Sweden
Stefan Arnhold Germany
Melissa J. Mahoney United States
Andrea Sinanan United Kingdom
William Ching relative to Susan Y. Fu United States Susan Y. Fu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Susan Y. Fu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Ching

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Ching's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Ching with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Ching more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Ching

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Ching. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Ching. The network helps show where William Ching may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Ching, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Ching Line = papers co-authored together William Ching links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2001462
2 1997305
3 1987198
4 1984162
5 198577
6 199971
7 198971
8 201142
9 199126
10
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THREE DIFFERENT POROUS CERAMICS
198418
11 201011
12 19735
13 19804
14 19794
15 19732
16 19780

About William Ching

William Ching is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery and Spectroscopy, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (5 papers), Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (3 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (3 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (3 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Muscle Physiology and Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (320 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (595 citations), Oral Surgery (167 citations), Neurology (113 citations) and Orthodontics (54 citations). William Ching has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include James L. Salzer, Steven Einheber, Eric R. McCartney, Atsumasa Uchida, Sydney Nade, E.R. McCartney, George Zanazzi, Teresa A. Milner, Elior Peles and Steven S. Scherer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurocytology, Journal of Neuroscience, Experimental Neurology, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research and Journal of Orthopaedic Research®.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact