William C. Denison

1.4k citations
36 papers · 663 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

William C. Denison

34 papers receiving 510 citations

Peers

William C. Denison
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 410
  • Plant Science 436
  • Cell Biology 173
  • Pharmacology 87
  • Insect Science 64
Replace Tsuneo Igarashi with:
Tsuneo Igarashi Japan
Gary A. Laursen United States
G. T. S. Baylis New Zealand
D. Benkert Germany
F. Brent Reeves United States
Thomas E. O’Dell United States
E. Arnolds Netherlands
N.J. Dix United Kingdom
J. Paula Wilkie New Zealand
Peitsa Mikola Finland
William C. Denison relative to Tsuneo Igarashi Japan Tsuneo Igarashi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Tsuneo Igarashi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William C. Denison

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William C. Denison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William C. Denison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William C. Denison more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William C. Denison

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William C. Denison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William C. Denison. The network helps show where William C. Denison may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside William C. Denison, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William C. Denison Line = papers co-authored together William C. Denison links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197794
2 197589
3 197346
4 200336
5 197230
6 196628
7 199525
8 197424
9 198823
10 200323
11 196622
12 198217
13 196416
14 195916
15 196714
16 197213
17 196913
18 198013
19 197913
20 199513

About William C. Denison

William C. Denison is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cell Biology, Food Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 663 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (14 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (11 papers), Botanical Research and Applications (8 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (7 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (6 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (4 papers), Plant and animal studies (4 papers) and Fungal Biology and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (410 citations), Plant Science (436 citations), Cell Biology (173 citations), Pharmacology (87 citations) and Insect Science (64 citations). William C. Denison has collaborated with scholars based in United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include George C. Carroll, John Donoghue, Diane M. Tracy, Martha A. Sherwood, Thomas C. Allen, Andrea Ostrofsky, W. B. Bollen, Warwick B. Silvester, Charles Hagedorn and B. A. Caldwell. Their work appears in journals such as Mycologia, The Bryologist, Persoonia - Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi, Microbial Ecology and Scientific American.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact