Thomas E. O’Dell

1.1k citations
19 papers · 875 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas E. O’Dell

19 papers receiving 787 citations

Peers

Thomas E. O’Dell
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Insect Science 279
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 376
  • Plant Science 670
  • Cell Biology 275
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 140
Replace Sonia Fontenla with:
Sonia Fontenla Argentina
E. Arnolds Netherlands
Ingeborg Haug Germany
Adriana Corrales United States
Paul Gosling United Kingdom
Tanja R. Scheublin Netherlands
Álvaro López‐García Spain
Jean C. Stutz United States
Sonya Erlandson United States
Lea Corkidi United States
Thomas E. O’Dell relative to Sonia Fontenla Argentina Sonia Fontenla's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Sonia Fontenla · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. O’Dell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. O’Dell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. O’Dell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. O’Dell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. O’Dell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. O’Dell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. O’Dell. The network helps show where Thomas E. O’Dell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. O’Dell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas E. O’Dell Line = papers co-authored together Thomas E. O’Dell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2009157
2 199380
3 200080
4
Collecting and describing macrofungi
200478
5 200463
6 199961
7 199860
8 201451
9 200149
10 200346
11 199932
12 199230
13
Approaches to sampling macrofungi
200424
14 200618
15
Recommended protocols for sampling macrofungi
200418
16
Diversity and conservation of forest fungi
199612
17 20067
18 20066
19 20193

About Thomas E. O’Dell

Thomas E. O’Dell is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cell Biology, Insect Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 19 papers that have together received 875 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (13 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (7 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (7 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (4 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (2 papers), Plant and animal studies (2 papers) and Plant and fungal interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (279 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (376 citations), Plant Science (670 citations), Cell Biology (275 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (140 citations). Thomas E. O’Dell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Joseph F. Ammirati, James M. Trappe, Edward G. Schreiner, Nancy Collins Johnson, Matthias C. Rillig, V. Bala Chaudhary, D. Jean Lodge, Gregory M. Mueller, Randy Molina and Susie Dunham. Their work appears in journals such as Mycologia, New Phytologist, Fungal ecology, Ecological Applications and Canadian Journal of Plant Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact